There will always be vice in the world. Large and small, it can be found virtually anywhere. There also will always be virtue in the world, for one cannot exist without the other.
Wherever we look, particularly on the news and self-proclaimed informative platforms, it is easy to find vice. Systemic injustice, wealth inequality, capital prejudice of all kinds—and the perpetrators are rarely punished. It is easy to think that vice rules everything in the world, doubly so because our brains have a natural tendency to emphasise negativity. (This bias was useful pre-civilisation, when humans were more prey than predator; it is generally not as useful now.) Following this manner of thinking, it may be tempting to value vice over virtue. Not necessarily.
I do not intend to undermine the vice in this world, but it is worth remembering that not everything is vicious. We know this. Charities and organisations exist, and many leave a positive impact. I lack examples, but if you observe carefully, you will know that virtue can still thrive even when everything around seems to act against our best interest. To live in virtue or in vice, the choice is yours. In my opinion, living virtuously is better.
Broadly speaking, acting more virtuously than viciously favours our ambitions. Treating others fairly can produce potential allies, or at least non-enemies. Patiently executing a solution tends to solve problems more effectively. Balance and inner peace emerge from moderation. Furthermore, vicious acts are typically responses to something beyond our full governance, be it an emotion, a thought, someone's actions, or circumstances. Very few people, if any, act in vice purely for the sake of harming. Virtuous acts, more often than not, assist us in living more satisfyingly, more productively and with more stability. And, generally, people prefer that. I suppose, though, that none of it matters if living in such a manner is not your aim.
Regardless of whether you choose virtue or vice, both should be thought of as directions, not goals. For one to exist, the other must as well—virtuous acts without some idea of vicious acts are simply acts, both of them. You will not always act in virtue (or in vice), and that is to be expected; striving naturally requires some amount of error, but it tends to ease over time.